Registration
Certify
FSI standards
Onboarding and latest news
Onboarding Programme
Latest news
We want to help the suppliers get on board. The members' council has set this as an important condition for the decision on digital environmental registration and certification.
More information about the implementation of this programme will follow.
Read more about the taken decisions and get inspired by your fellow growers!
General
- Second party for environmental registration will be available soon
- Digital environmental registration and certification remains a priority for our marketplace
- Royal FloraHolland makes environmental certification mandatory by the end of 2021
- Environmental certification is good for the image of the marketplace
Supplier
Buyer
- Royal Lemkes talks about sustainable awareness
- Waterdrinker: Work on a sustainable future and obtain certification
- Inspire people to
produce sustainably - Fleurametz
Frequently asked questions
Will sanctions be imposed if growers do not meet the requirements within the agreed time frame?
The Council of Members advised the Board of Directors on this on 8 October 2020.
The final decision of the management is expected in the week of 19 October 2020.
Is Royal FloraHolland postponing the mandatory environmental registration and certification due to the corona crisis?
Many companies in the horticulture industry have been very hard hit by the corona crisis. Royal FloraHolland is doing everything it can to support growers and customers in these difficult times. In view of creating a futureproof marketplace, Royal FloraHolland will continue to prioritise all strategic projects, including environmental registration and certification.
As of 31 January 2020, all suppliers (cooperative members and non-members) will be required by Royal FloraHolland to have a digital environmental registration and as of 31 January 2021, environmental certification in line with the market.
The Members' Council determined that mandatory environmental registration and certification can only be introduced if everyone, in line with the principles of reasonableness and fairness, has the time and opportunity to comply. This point of view remains unchanged. In September 2020, we will assess in conjunction with the Sustainability Leading Team whether the preconditions set by the Members' Council have been met and whether it is reasonable to stick to the starting dates for introduction and enforcement quoted above.
Why has Royal FloraHolland made environmental registration and certification a requirement to supply to the marketplace?
With the decision to enforce the requirement, we as a cooperative and a company have taken the initiative to make our sustainability efforts transparent in a verifiable manner. In so doing, we can jointly safeguard the reputation of our products, our sector and our common marketplace.
The market also increasingly demands transparency regarding the production of flowers and plants, as well as the business operations of the suppliers. The relevant criteria have been incorporated in certificates. After being awarded certification, growers can reliably demonstrate that they meet the criteria that have been set. In turn, buyers' demands for targeted and efficient certified sustainable procurement will be met.
We also see that the government is pursuing increasingly stricter policies on sustainability. It is a good idea to stay ahead of new regulations by proactively and jointly demonstrating that we produce in an increasingly sustainable manner. Moreover, certification offers opportunities to differentiate yourself and promotes international competitiveness.
How did this decision come about?
The decision process was conducted with due diligence. After a period of intense cooperation between the Sustainability Leading Team (consisting of growers in the cooperative) and the RFH Sustainable Development Team, and on the basis of member consultations in 2018 and 2019, a concrete approach was developed to introduce mandatory digital environmental registration and certification for all suppliers to the Royal FloraHolland marketplace. On 10 October 2019, the Members' Council issued a positive recommendation on this approach, and set a number of binding preconditions. On 27 October 2019, the Management Board decided to proceed with implementation, aware that the preconditions set have yet to be met, but in the confidence that they will be.
In September 2020, we will assess in conjunction with the Sustainability Leading Team whether the preconditions set by the Members' Council have been met and whether it is reasonable to stick to the starting dates for enforcement quoted above. In October, the Members' Council will issue a recommendation to the Management Board, after which the Management Board will reach a decision.
To whom does the obligation apply and starting when?
The obligation applies to all suppliers (members or non-members) to our marketplace. From 31 December 2020, every supplier must demonstrably carry a digital environmental registration through one of the market-based registration tools. By 31 December 2021 at the latest, every supplier must have a market-compliant environmental certificate.
Suppliers who are themselves not growers will be obliged to transparently prove that the products they supply have been sourced from certified growers. We need a little more time to find an appropriate solution to this matter and will communicate more about this in due course.
What is the status with regard to meeting the preconditions?
The emphasis is on meeting the following three preconditions:
- Informing, activating and 'onboarding' our members.
- Improving accessibility of existing certifying organisations
- Alternatives to digital registration and certification
1. Informing,
activating and 'onboarding' our members
In June 2020, we confirmed in a
news item (published in the RFH Digital Newsletter) that
Royal FloraHolland will continue to prioritise digital
environmental registration and certification. It is and remains an
important pillar of the RFH strategy. We will therefore continue to
inform suppliers (members and non-members) as much as possible
about the process, progress with regard to preconditions, costs,
the second certification party, etc. In August 2020, we contributed
to a special issue on certification of the trade journal Vakblad
voor de Bloemisterij, with an interview about transparency through
certification. (
Transparency though certification)
In addition to providing information, we will also take action as soon as there is a choice of digital environmental registration and certification bodies - i.e. if there is a second party with a concrete commercial offer besides MPS. We will actively help suppliers in the specific process of choosing between registration/certification options. The supplier will be able to make an informed choice concerning:
- Rates
- Ease of use
- Support
Suppliers who have registered online will be introduced to the digital registration and certification process through 'onboarding'. The responsibility for this lies chiefly with the party arranging registration and certification, such as MPS and GreenlinQ/GlobalG.A.P. Royal FloraHolland is discussing the requirements for onboarding with the various parties and will actively monitor the process. By sharing experiences, concerns and other feedback from suppliers with these parties, we will continuously improve the onboarding process. Various scenarios to achieve this are being designed in conjunction with these parties.
2. Improving
accessibility of existing certifying organisations
With the new MPS ABC 3.0 scheme, MPS fully complies with the
standards for digital environmental registration and environmental
certification. Growers who want to get started straightaway should
contact MPS. MPS has set a separate fee for the first year's
registration for Dutch growers (€290). In the second year, a total
fee - the certification fee - will apply, which MPS has reduced for
growers with a small cultivation area. For more information, please
visit the MPS
website:
In the EU and Israel, the special fee of €290 is also valid for the first year of digital registration (covered and uncovered cultivation). The rates for certification in these countries and the rates for countries outside the EU will be published as soon as possible.
3. Alternatives for
digital registration and certification
We are working on creating at least one alternative registration
tool in addition to MPS, so that growers have a choice regarding
environmental registration and certification. We have
confidence that there will be a timely alternative to MPS in the
Dutch market.
The
Netherlands
GlobalG.A.P. is working on a separate environmental programme that
meets the criteria set by FSI. With GreenlinQdata they are also
testing whether the exchange of environmental data is smooth
through the link between their systems. Once it is successful, the
combination GreenlinQdata/GlobalG.A.P. will be an alternative to
digital environmental registration and certification in the
Netherlands.
The price of this alternative is not yet known. GlobalG.A.P. does not work with an 'all-in fee' such as MPS. Growers who register with GlobalG.A.P. will have to make a choice from a list of certifying organisations (abbreviated as: 'CBs') in their country and a registration tool approved by GlobalG.A.P., such as GreenlinQdata. The price will then be composed of:
- Payment to the GlobalG.A.P organisation (depending on hectares).
- Costs of annual audit.
- Costs of registration tool use.
We will inform you as soon as the prices are known.
Germany, Belgium,
Italy and Spain
The GreenlinQdata/GlobalG.A.P combination will probably be the
alternative in Germany, Belgium, Italy and Spain, too. This is due
in part to the fact that a number of growers in these countries
grow fruit and vegetables in addition to flowers/plants and are
therefore already familiar with the GlobalG.A.P. scheme.
Israel
In Israel, two local farm management tools 'Akologic' and
'FarmManager', are looking into the possibility of linking with
GlobalG.A.P.
Kenya and
Ethiopia
In Kenya and Colombia, KFC and Florverde respectively are the
alternative to MPS. These programmes meet all the criteria set by
FSI.
Ethiopia
In Ethiopia, EHPEA has yet to link digital environmental
registration to its scheme in order to comply with the FSI
criteria. Partly due to the corona crisis, it is difficult to
determine the status of this process.
Why is it necessary for growers to obtain an environmental certificate in addition to all the (legally) mandatory registrations?
The legally mandatory registrations don't fully cover the environmental requirements made by the market. An environmental certificate does: a digital environmental registration linked to a scheme is validated with an audit and possibly sampling. This way, the environmental performance of a grower can be transparently and reliably established. Moreover, an environmental certificate will demonstrate that a grower meets any legal requirements.
Digital and uniform registration is also important. There is a great need in the sector for reliable, secure data and information in anticipation to future developments such as footprints and environmental-impact indicators. These things will also help us strengthen the reputation of the products, the sector and our market place.
How many members currently have a certificate?
Most members realise that the market demands transparency with regard to the way in which their flowers and plants are produced and that this should be demonstrated by means of a certificate. Currently, roughly 56% of our members are not yet certified. This is often because their customers do not or do not consistently ask for certification, and because they find obtaining a certificate to be too complex or expensive. Nevertheless, everyone will ultimately be obliged to comply with mandatory certification.
How can I make my certification known?
In our marketplace, growers can demonstrate how sustainable their production is by providing certificates, among other ways. The certificates are already visible in the supply and on the clock, and in Floriday they can be found on the grower page. Supply is to follow. Buyers can include certificates in their selection/search criteria and thus find certified supply quickly and efficiently.
What are the requirements that an digital environmental registration and certification must meet? What is ‘market-compliant’?
The requirements have been laid down by the Floriculture Sustainability Initiative. Registration involves the uniform and digital documentation of any crop protection agents used, as well as information on fertilisers and associated water and energy consumption. These are things of which the law requires growers to keep a record already. Supplementary to this statutory requirement, the relevant information must now be documented digitally. In addition, a plan for Integrated Pest Management is being requested. Requirements set by the FSI for certification focus in particular on the way in which inspection takes place (audit and perhaps sampling).
Can I start digital registration today? And what are the options?
With the new MPS ABC 3.0 scheme, MPS fully complies with the standards for digital environmental registration and environmental certification. Growers who want to get started straightaway should contact MPS. MPS has set a separate fee for the first year's registration for Dutch growers. In the second year, a total fee - the certification fee - will apply, which MPS has reduced for growers with a small cultivation area. For more information, please visit the MPS website: The fees for growers abroad have yet to be set. MPS is organising meetings (online and on site nationwide) to inform growers about the new programme. For more information, please visit the MPS website: https://my-mps.com/diensten/mps-abc/?lang=en.
Will Royal FloraHolland help me get started with registration and certification?
Yes, this is an important condition set by the Members' Council. An onboarding programme with information sessions is being put together in conjunction with the Sustainability Leading Team.
Are any further certification requirements planned after the mandatory environmental certification?
Mandatory digital environmental registration and certification is a first step in creating transparency in our marketplace w.r.t. sustainable production. The obligation applies to all suppliers (members and non-members) to our marketplace. From 31 December 2020, every supplier must demonstrably carry digital environmental registration through one of the market-based registration tools. By 31 December 2021 at the latest, every supplier must possess a market-compliant environmental certificate.
The market is moving forward and several buyers are asking for multiple certificates. Ultimately, Royal FloraHolland envisages that all suppliers to the marketplace will also comply with the FSI social sustainability norms, and those relating to Good Agricultural Practices (G.A.P.). Both MPS and GreenlinQdata/GlobalG.A.P. are offering direct access to a G.A.P. certificate via the digital environmental registration and certification route
What is the position of Veiling Rhein Maas regarding mandatory digital environmental registration and certification?
VRM underscores the importance of a demonstrably sustainable horticulture chain and warmly recommends the Royal FloraHolland obligations w.r.t. digital environmental registration and certification to RFH suppliers, as well as to Landgard suppliers. For the time being, registration and certification will be mandatory at VRM for Premium Quality products, edible plants, Fairtrade products and Deutsche Gärtnerware only. Producers trading such products through VRM will be obliged to start the digital environmental registration process by 31 December 2020, and to be in possession of environmental certification by 31 December 2021.
Will VRM enforce registration and certification for Royal FloraHolland members?
In September 2020, Royal FloraHolland will assess in conjunction with the Sustainability Leading Team whether the preconditions set by the Members' Council have been met and whether it is reasonable to stick to the starting dates for enforcement quoted above. VRM will await Royal FloraHolland's decision in this regard and will then adopt an appropriate position concerning enforcement at VRM.
How are the legislation differences per country handled in terms of environmental certificates?
The certificates require companies to comply with the law regarding subjects/themes relevant to the scheme. The local legislation of the country where the producer is located takes precedence. There are differences between countries when it comes to crop protection, authorisation in particular. These differences are sometimes relatively large, and 'old' active substances no longer permitted in Europe might still be used, especially in Africa. On the other hand, producers in Africa are not (yet) always able to use the new, modern active substances.
In order to create a level playing field, MPS has created the MPS Blacklist for Crop Protection Products. This includes a number of old active substances that put too much of a strain on people and/or the environment, and are therefore not permitted within the scheme. Moreover, the European market often sets specific requirements superseding local legislation in various countries. This means that for the manufacturer abroad, the market requirements are often leading and not the requirements of the local production country.
What can I expect the coming period?
The following is planned for the coming months:
September 2020:
- Information about the pricing of the options for digital environmental registration and certification in the Netherlands and (as far as known) abroad and the launch of the programme to activate growers and help them in choosing and 'onboarding' the registration tools.
- Assessment of the Sustainability Leading Team whether the preconditions set by the Members' Council regarding the compulsory digital environmental registration and certification have been met.
- Evaluation by the Members' Council about the proposed policy for enforcement and sanctioning.
October 2020
- Members' Council will issue recommendation to the Management Board about the proposed policy for enforcement and sanctioning.
- Decision of the Management Board based on the recommendation by the Members' Council.
